The development and application of land surface models with a focus on the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. My overall aim is to advance the understanding of the biogeochemical cycles and their interactions with the climate system by introducing ecological theory into physically-based models.
Feel free to contact me in case you are interested in any of the topics below: email addressFollow @Pdevilselement
Nutrient limitation of land carbon uptake
Currently, about one third of the fossil fuel CO2 emissions is taken up by land ecosystems, but there is no guarantee that this ecosystem service will continue into the future (Global Carbon Project). In particular, the limited availability of plant nutrients could pose a thread to the continuation of land carbon uptake in the near future (for example Norby et al. (2010), Goll et al., 2012).
Simulations with the Max Planck Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) indicate a dominant role of phosphorus availability in constraining global land carbon uptake – not only for tropical regions, but also for higher latitudes (Figure 1; Goll et al., 2012). A recent analyses of foliar nutrition data of European ecosystems(Jonard et al. , 2015, Talkner et al., 2015) and a fertilization experiments in the USA (Goswami et al. 2018) supports the model prediction of extra-tropical P limitation. However, the incomplete process understanding and parameter uncertainties hamper the generalization of the model results.
Figure 1: The reduction of carbon uptake during the 21st century due to nitrogen (top) and phosphorus (bottom) limitation. Simulations with MPI-ESM under SRES A1B scenario. From Goll et al., 2012.
None of the Earth System Models used in climate change projections consider effects of phosphorus availability on the CO2 uptake of terrestrial ecosystems. The amount of phosphorus needed to sustain the CO2 uptake simulated by these models can be diagnosed using stoichiometric information. However, it is currently not possible to quantify the amount of phosphorus which would be available to sustain future CO2 uptake at an accuracy which would allow to assess if Earth System Models do overestimate CO2 uptake or not (Sun et al., 2017). A better understanding of soil phosphorus availability and phosphorus recycling in the ecosystem (Margalef et al. 2017) is needed, before conclusion should be drawn (Brovkin & Goll, 2015).
In summary, the interactions between the cycles of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus are yet not fully understood. which hampers projections of nutrient availability. A better process understanding is needed which is the aim of my current work in the IMBALANCE-P project.
Weathering – the thermostat of the planet
CO2 reacts with minerals contained in globally abundant silicate rocks, a process that naturally moderates atmospheric CO2 and stabilizes climate on geological timescales. It is therefore referred to as “the thermostat of the planet”. Commonly it assumed that the rate at which weathering removes CO2 from the atmosphere is rather constant on human timescales. Nonetheless, global warming has likely already accelerated CO2 to a small, but non-negligible, extent (Goll et al. 2014). Besides removing CO2 , essential plant nutrients are released during weathering, including phosphorus.
The natural process of weathering can be enhanced by the amendment of soils with crushed rocks, like basalt grains. Not only do these minerals remove CO2 from the atmosphere but also increase soil fertility. Therefore the Enhancement of weathering is being considered an option for climate mitigation and food security. Advantages compared to other climate mitigation measures are that it has a low technical risk and can be co-deployed with other land use practices without competing for land used to grow wood and food nor increasing the demand for fresh water (Beerling et al. 2018). The lack of an appropriate quantitative framework (accounting for nutrient related aspects) is currently hampering the assessment of the full potential of enhanced weathering for climate mitigation (Strefler et al. 2018).
Uncertainties in CO2 emission from land use and land cover change
The quantification of sources and sinks of carbon from land use and land cover changes (LULCC) is uncertain (Houghton et al., 2012). We investigated the uncertainty in the historical and future carbon fluxes in the MPI Earth System Model (MPI-ESM).
The net LULCC flux strongly depends on the assumed fraction of biomass which enters the atmosphere directly due to burning or use in short-lived products. Globally, historical emissions vary up to 25% depending on this fraction which is insufficiently constrained from data. This effect strongly depends on the parametrization of decomposition. Overall, we found a uncertainty in the decadal LULCC fluxes of the recent past due to the parametrization of decomposition and direct emissions of 0.6 Pg C yr−1, which is three times larger than the uncertainty previously attributed to model and method in general (Houghton et al., 2012).
This finding indicates that there is a imbalance between the evaluation and representation of fundamental processes, like decomposition, and implementing second order processes, like for example dynamical changes in natural land cover, nutrient cycles, or shifting cultivation.
Ecosystem adjustments to changing environmental conditions: adaptation and acclimation
Changes in temperature affect fundamental processes and their interactions in ecosystems. Models which incorporate our best understanding of all the modes of action of the individual factors will also capture many of the major interactions regarding temperature.
In model projections for the 21st century, the response of tropical ecosystems to warming dominates the dynamics of the terrestrial sink (Raddatz et al., 2007). It is the tropical ecosystems where temperatures are most likely to exceed the optimum for photosynthesis in a warming climate. There is considerable controversy about the vulnerability of tropical trees to a future warming (Clark, 2004; Feeley et al., 2007; Lloyd & Farquhar, 2008). In particular, the limited understanding of the extent to which ecosystems adjust to gradual changes in temperature (Medlyn et al., 2002; June et al., 2004; Kattge et al., 2007; Lin et al., 2012) hampers our ability to constrain ecosystem responses to global warming (Lloyd & Farquhar, 2008; Booth et al., 2012).